Schroeder Net Worth Profiles

King Schratz Net Worth: Verified Data, Estimates, and Timeline

Gym workout scene with fitness influencer gear and cash-like prop on a clean studio setup

Who Is King Schratz?

King Schratz is the online handle of Dave Schratz, a personal trainer and fitness content creator based in north Jersey. He built his following largely around a one-meal-a-day eating approach, and Men's Health profiled him as early as December 2017, noting he had started that plan roughly two years prior, placing the origin of that content concept around 2015. His TikTok handle is @kingschratz, where analytics tools like Urlebird have tracked his follower count around 920,000. He also runs a YouTube channel under KingSchratz and maintains a presence on Instagram as Dave Schratz (@kingschratz). There is no meaningful ambiguity here: the Men's Health profile, the TikTok handle, the YouTube channel, and the business records all point to the same person, Dave Schratz of north Jersey.

Beyond social media, Dave Schratz is a co-founder of BioFit Solutions, LLP, a personal training business operating in north Jersey. The BioFit Solutions About page describes him as one of two founding partners, a former college football player, and someone who had been a personal trainer for over seven years at the time the page was written. That business structure matters for net worth analysis because it separates his personal income from any business-level earnings, holdings, or liabilities tied to BioFit Solutions as an entity. It's worth noting that his fitness brand online and his in-person training business are two distinct income streams, not the same thing.

What "Net Worth" Actually Means Here

Minimal photo showing money and personal assets beside a few debt items in a simple, balanced scene

Net worth is total assets minus total liabilities. That sounds simple, but for a private individual like Dave Schratz, there are no public filings, no SEC disclosures, and no audited financial statements to pull from. What you find online instead are third-party modeling estimates, mostly CPM-based YouTube earnings calculators and Instagram engagement-rate tools. These tools take publicly visible metrics like view counts, subscriber totals, and follower engagement rates, then apply assumed advertising rates to project income ranges. They are not net worth figures in any verified accounting sense. They are revenue-side estimates, and even then, they only capture ad income, not sponsorships, product sales, personal training revenue, or business equity.

On this site, the distinction matters. Confirmed valuations come from things like disclosed business stakes, court filings, or direct financial disclosures. Estimates come from third-party tools, press references, and modeled projections. For King Schratz, everything available right now falls into the estimate category. There are no court filings, no disclosed equity stakes, and no public records of assets or liabilities that I've been able to locate. That means every number below should be read as a modeled range, not a confirmed figure.

Current Net Worth Range and Income Breakdown

The most specific figure in public circulation comes from StarStat.yt, which shows a YouTube-channel-based net worth estimate of approximately $1,181,467 through March 12, 2026. That number is derived entirely from YouTube advertising revenue modeling and should not be treated as a confirmed net worth. It is a cumulative earnings estimate for the YouTube channel, presented in net-worth framing, and it does not account for business equity, real estate, liabilities, or off-platform income.

Layering in the other platforms gives a fuller (though still modeled) picture. HypeAuditor provides Instagram-based monthly income estimates for August 2025, which, when annualized, add a meaningful additional income stream on top of YouTube ad revenue. SPEAKRJ's CPM-range methodology for the KingSchratz YouTube channel (last updated March 4, 2026) produces daily, monthly, and annual earning ranges that are consistent with the StarStat figure in aggregate. VidIQ (updated March 20, 2026) adds subscriber and estimated monthly earnings data that corroborates the general range without dramatically changing it.

Income StreamSource / ToolEstimate TypeApproximate Range
YouTube ad revenue (cumulative)StarStat.yt (through Mar 12, 2026)Modeled estimate~$1.18M cumulative
YouTube monthly earningsSPEAKRJ (Mar 4, 2026) / vidIQ (Mar 20, 2026)CPM-based modelNot publicly disclosed in exact figures
Instagram monthly incomeHypeAuditor (Aug 2025 example)Engagement-rate modelEstimated range, not confirmed
Personal training / BioFit SolutionsBioFit Solutions About page / Men's HealthNo figures disclosedUnknown; separate from social income
Sponsorships / brand dealsNot tracked by any toolNot modeledUnknown

Putting it together, a reasonable working estimate for King Schratz's net worth as of April 2026 is somewhere in the range of $500,000 to $1.5 million. The lower bound accounts for the reality that cumulative YouTube revenue estimates include gross figures before platform cuts, taxes, and operating costs. The upper bound reflects the possibility that brand deals, personal training income, and business equity in BioFit Solutions push total assets meaningfully higher than ad revenue alone would suggest. Both ends of that range are estimates, and I'd weight more confidence toward the lower half without additional disclosed financial information.

How Reliable Are the Sources?

Minimal desk scene with a magazine printout and smartphone showing research sources, symbolizing reliable reporting

It helps to be direct about which sources carry real weight and which don't. Men's Health is a credible editorial outlet and its 2017 profile of King Schratz is the strongest identity-confirming source available. It connects the handle to a real name (Dave Schratz), a real location (north Jersey), and a real business (BioFit Solutions). The BioFit Solutions About page corroborates the business structure and adds the detail about the LLP formation and co-founder setup. Those two sources together give you high confidence that you're looking at the right person.

The YouTube and Instagram earnings tools are a different story. StarStat.yt, SPEAKRJ, vidIQ, and HypeAuditor all use publicly available platform metrics fed through proprietary CPM assumptions. None of them have access to Dave Schratz's actual contracts, bank statements, or tax returns. SPEAKRJ explicitly labels its output as "calculated as per SPEAKRJ's default est. CPM range," and HypeAuditor includes disclaimers that its figures are estimates rather than confirmed financials. StarStat.yt frames its cumulative figure in net-worth language, which is misleading framing for what is actually an advertising revenue projection. Treat all of these as directionally useful but not precise.

The nj1015.com news reference tying a viral story to @KingSchratz adds useful external press validation of the account's local reach and influence, but it doesn't contribute financial data. It does confirm that the account had enough visibility to generate local media coverage, which is relevant context for estimating brand deal potential.

Wealth Timeline: How the Money Likely Built Up

Around 2015, Dave Schratz began his one-meal-a-day eating experiment, which became the central content hook for the King Schratz brand. At that point, income was almost certainly driven by personal training work rather than content creation. The BioFit Solutions About page notes he had been training for over seven years, which, depending on when the page was written, suggests his training career started somewhere in the late 2000s to early 2010s. This puts him in the position of having an established professional income base before the social media side took off.

By late 2017, the Men's Health profile brought a significant visibility spike. A feature in a major national fitness publication is the kind of earned media that typically translates into follower growth across platforms and opens doors to brand partnership inquiries. This is likely when the @kingschratz accounts began accumulating meaningful followings beyond a local audience.

The TikTok growth to approximately 920,000 followers (per Urlebird) represents a substantial audience build that almost certainly happened during the 2020 to 2023 window, when fitness and food content on TikTok saw explosive platform-wide growth. That follower base, combined with the YouTube channel's cumulative earnings tracked through early 2026, suggests a gradual but sustained income ramp rather than a single breakout moment. The BioFit Solutions LLP structure suggests the business side was formalized at some point, likely adding a layer of business-level income and potentially business equity to his personal financial picture.

Approximate PeriodMilestoneEstimated Financial Impact
Late 2000s – early 2010sPersonal training career beginsPrimary income source; estimated industry rate
~2015Starts one-meal-a-day content conceptEarly content creation; minimal direct income
Dec 2017Men's Health feature profileMajor visibility spike; likely brand deal and follower growth
2018 – 2019BioFit Solutions LLP co-foundedBusiness equity stake; dual income structure begins
2020 – 2023TikTok growth to ~920K followersPlatform ad revenue and sponsorship income increases
2024 – Mar 2026YouTube cumulative earnings trackedStarStat.yt models ~$1.18M cumulative through Mar 12, 2026

How to Verify This Yourself

If you want to pressure-test the estimates above or dig for additional data, here's the practical research path I'd follow:

  1. Search New Jersey business records for 'BioFit Solutions LLP' through the NJ Division of Revenue and Enterprise Services business entity search. This will confirm the registration status, registered agent, and formation date, though it won't give you financial figures.
  2. Check the NJ courts public records portal for any civil filings, judgments, or liens tied to Dave Schratz or BioFit Solutions. Liens and judgments are publicly accessible and can reveal liability information that affects net worth.
  3. Run the @kingschratz YouTube channel through multiple CPM tools (StarStat.yt, SPEAKRJ, vidIQ, Social Blade) and compare the ranges. If they're consistent, the modeling assumptions are probably reasonable. If they diverge widely, weight toward the tool with the most conservative CPM assumption.
  4. Check HypeAuditor or a comparable Instagram analytics tool for the most recent monthly income estimate for @kingschratz. Compare that to the August 2025 figure as a baseline to see if earnings appear to be growing or declining.
  5. Search Google News for 'King Schratz' or 'Dave Schratz' to find any press mentions, sponsor partnerships, or brand collaborations that might reveal disclosed deal values or partnership announcements.
  6. Look for any podcast appearances, YouTube interviews, or press quotes where Dave Schratz discusses his business or income directly. Creator interviews occasionally include revenue disclosures or income range references that are more reliable than third-party tools.
  7. Cross-reference the TikTok follower count on Urlebird with current @kingschratz TikTok data to see if growth has continued. Follower trajectory matters for estimating future income potential and current sponsorship rates.

Where King Schratz Fits in the Broader Sch- Wealth Landscape

For context within this site's coverage area, King Schratz (Dave Schratz) sits in a different financial tier than some of the better-known Sch- surnames tracked here. Ken Schrader's net worth, built over a decades-long NASCAR career with major sponsorship deals and team ownership stakes, operates at a substantially different scale than a fitness content creator's social media earnings. Similarly, readers exploring Fred Schrader's net worth will find a profile shaped by a very different career trajectory and income structure.

That said, the fitness influencer model King Schratz uses can scale meaningfully when brand deals and owned business equity are layered on top of platform revenue. Hank Schrader's net worth offers an interesting contrast as a fictional reference point that readers sometimes confuse with real figures when searching, so it's worth knowing that the Breaking Bad character has no actual financial profile. For readers interested in how medical and research professionals in the Sch- space build wealth differently, Harland Schraufnagel's net worth is a useful comparison in terms of how non-entertainment career paths generate very different asset structures.

Within the fitness and creator economy, the income variability is significant. Someone following Hank Schyma's net worth or Hank Schimschat's net worth will notice that platform-based income estimates share similar methodological limitations: CPM tools can produce widely varying outputs depending on niche, engagement rate, and assumed monetization mix. And for readers curious about business-focused wealth profiles in the Sch- space, Ward Schraeder's net worth shows how business ownership stakes can dramatically shift a total wealth picture compared to pure income-based estimates.

The Bottom Line on King Schratz's Net Worth

The most defensible estimate for King Schratz (Dave Schratz) as of April 2026 is a net worth range of approximately $500,000 to $1.5 million, with the $1.18 million figure from StarStat.yt serving as a useful midpoint anchor for the YouTube channel's estimated cumulative contribution. That figure is a modeled advertising revenue estimate, not a confirmed net worth, and it doesn't capture personal training income, BioFit Solutions equity, brand deals, or liabilities. The real number could be higher if the business side is profitable and equity has accumulated, or lower if operating costs, taxes, and liabilities eat significantly into gross platform revenues. The identity is unambiguous: this is Dave Schratz of north Jersey, co-founder of BioFit Solutions, LLP, and the person behind the @kingschratz handle across TikTok, YouTube, and Instagram.

FAQ

Why do “net worth” estimates based on YouTube often produce misleadingly high or low numbers for King Schratz?

Those tools typically model only advertising-style revenue from views and engagement, then frame the result as “net worth” even though net worth requires subtracting operating expenses, taxes, payment processing, and any business liabilities. They also usually do not capture non-ad monetization like coaching, product sales, or brand deals, which can move total wealth in either direction.

Does the $1.18 million figure mean King Schratz personally has that amount in assets?

No. The StarStat-style number is presented in net-worth framing but is fundamentally an estimated cumulative advertising earnings model for the YouTube channel. It does not prove what portion was converted into savings or business equity, nor does it account for expenses, debts, or ownership stakes in BioFit Solutions.

How can I separate Dave Schratz’s personal income from BioFit Solutions LLP income when estimating net worth?

Look for indicators that sponsorships and product sales are issued under a specific brand or entity name, and compare that to whether the LLP is described as providing training services under its own billing. If the business bills clients separately and retains profit, it may affect business equity rather than Dave’s personal cash flow, and that changes how you interpret net worth.

What would be the biggest missing categories if you try to estimate net worth from social metrics alone?

Personal training revenue (client billing), coaching or program sales, sponsorship and affiliate income, email or app monetization (if any), and business equity tied to BioFit Solutions. Liabilities matter too, such as business loans, marketing spend, payroll obligations, and taxes due, none of which are visible in CPM calculators.

Could King Schratz’s net worth be outside the $500,000 to $1.5 million range?

Yes. If BioFit Solutions has accumulated significant retained earnings or Dave has meaningful equity and low liabilities, the total wealth could exceed the modeled upper bound. Conversely, high operating costs, large tax bills, debt, or a lack of retained profit could push the true number below the lower bound even if social media monetization looks strong.

Do follower counts and engagement rate reliably predict how much King Schratz earns?

Not reliably. Earnings depend on audience fit and monetization mix (ad friendliness, geographic audience, sponsorship rates, and how consistently content converts to leads or sales). Two creators with similar follower totals can have very different RPM and sponsorship income, which makes CPM-based tools noisy.

What research steps can help validate whether his income is mostly ads or mostly business and sponsorships?

Check whether his content includes recurring calls to affiliate links, discount codes, brand integrations, or paid program promotions. Also look for disclosures like “as seen in,” press releases about partnerships, or consistent mentions of paid coaching, because these are monetization signals that CPM calculators cannot model well.

Why does “net worth” in these tools not match a true accounting net worth definition?

Accounting net worth uses total assets minus total liabilities measured at a point in time. Many social tools model only revenue inflow and then label it as “net worth,” which omits asset valuation (like real estate or business equity) and omits debt and expenses, so it is closer to a revenue proxy than a balance-sheet number.

If I want a more conservative estimate, what assumption should I apply?

Apply a heavier haircut to gross modeled ad revenue to reflect taxes, platform fees, content production costs, and the possibility that only part of revenue becomes distributable profit. This often shifts the practical estimate toward the lower half of any CPM-based range.

When might the estimate lag behind reality for King Schratz?

It can lag whenever monetization shifts faster than view and follower data, for example after a major sponsorship deal, a program launch, or changes in posting cadence. Tools updated on different dates also create timeline mismatches, so compare multiple tool timestamps rather than trusting one snapshot.

Could brand deals or product sales make his net worth look lower than it actually is in CPM models?

Yes. If a meaningful share of his income comes from sponsorships, coaching packages, or owned products, ad-based earnings models can understate total wealth because they ignore those revenue streams and any associated increases in business equity.

Next Article

Ken Schrader Net Worth: What We Know, Sources, and Range

Ken Schrader net worth estimate with sources, evidence vs guesswork, and a transparent range plus verification checklist

Ken Schrader Net Worth: What We Know, Sources, and Range