The most credible public estimate for blues guitarist Matt Schofield's net worth as of June 2026 is approximately $12.9 million, according to People AI's model-based estimate. That figure is not confirmed by audited financial statements, court records, or UK Companies House filings. It is a computed estimate derived from social engagement signals and YouTube monetization logic, not a verified balance-sheet total. If you need a working range rather than a single point, treat the figure as somewhere between $5 million and $15 million based on a realistic reading of his career earnings, touring activity, production credits, and digital revenue. Anything beyond that is speculation.
Matt Schofield Net Worth: What We Know and How Estimates Work
Which Matt Schofield are we talking about?

This is worth clearing up immediately because "Matt Schofield" and "Matthew Schofield" appear across several unrelated professional contexts in search results. The subject of this article is the English blues guitarist and singer born on August 21, 1977, in Manchester, England. He fronts the Matt Schofield Trio, records under his own name, and has been professionally active since 2000. His label is Nugene Records and he has production credits that extend beyond his own recordings, including co-producing work for fellow British blues artist Ian Siegal.
Other individuals who appear when you search this name include: a Matthew Schofield listed as a Senior Associate in a forensic engineering and consulting firm (WJE); a Matthew Schofield (MPA '11) who works as a senior director of procurement and analysis at Binghamton University; a Matt Schofield who managed a driving range in New Zealand (who made news in 2015 over stolen golf balls); and a Dr. Matt Schofield connected to Schofield Consulting Limited in the UK. None of these are the blues musician, and any net-worth data associated with those individuals has no bearing on the guitarist's finances. If you are researching one of those other individuals, this article is not about them.
The net worth estimate and its range
People AI puts Matt Schofield's 2026 net worth at $12.9 million, and their own historical series shows consistent year-over-year growth in their model outputs. Here is what that series looks like:
| Year | People AI Estimate | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | $7.74 million | Estimate only |
| 2023 | $9.03 million | Estimate only |
| 2024 | $10.3 million | Estimate only |
| 2025 | $11.6 million | Estimate only |
| 2026 | $12.9 million | Estimate only (as of April 2026) |
These figures look tidy precisely because they come from a model, not from primary financial records. The growth pattern is smooth and consistent, which is a common artifact of algorithmic estimation rather than real-world wealth accumulation (which tends to be lumpy, tied to specific events like album releases, tours, or asset sales). People AI explicitly disclaims that these numbers are "just estimation" and "by no means accurate," and assigns them a "net worth score" percentage (94% for 2026) that sounds authoritative but is itself a composite metric with no backing in verified asset records. Take the $12.9 million headline as a rough order-of-magnitude indicator, not a balance sheet.
Where these numbers come from

People AI's methodology relies on two main inputs: a "social factors" calculation (engagement, followers, public presence signals) and a YouTube monetization estimate based on view counts and subscriber data. Their YouTube-derived figure for Schofield's channel was documented as a very small range (approximately $745 to $1,490 from estimated ad/salary income based on YouTube stats pulled around March 28, 2026). That YouTube figure alone is negligible and clearly not the source of the multi-million dollar estimate. The bulk of the total figure comes from the social-factor model, which is essentially a black-box scoring system that does not cross-reference audited income, tax filings, property records, or equity stakes.
No primary financial records are in the public domain for Matt Schofield. There are no SEC filings (he is a UK-based individual with no publicly listed company shares), no Companies House records tied to him as a person of significant control in a filing that has been verified to the musician (as opposed to the other Matt Schofields mentioned above), no property registry disclosures, and no disclosed compensation contracts. Any site presenting a specific net-worth figure for him is working from inference, not documentation.
His documented income sources and professional roles
What can be confirmed is the structure of his career, which gives a realistic basis for understanding how his income is generated. He has three primary revenue channels as a professional musician: live performance, recorded music sales and streaming, and production work for other artists.
- Live touring as the Matt Schofield Trio: touring revenue is the dominant income source for most working blues guitarists at his level, including venue fees, festival bookings, and merchandise. He has toured internationally, including in the US and across Europe.
- Recorded music: studio albums released under Nugene Records across a career spanning 2000 to present, including 'Far As I Can See' (2014) and 'Many Moons / Vol.1' (2025). Streaming royalties and physical/digital sales contribute ongoing but typically modest income at the blues genre scale.
- Production credits: he has co-produced work for other artists, most notably Ian Siegal's 'Meat & Potatoes' and the live recording 'At The North Sea Jazz Festival.' Production fees and production royalty points on those albums represent supplemental income.
- YouTube and digital platforms: estimated ad revenue is small (People AI's model puts channel-level YouTube income in the hundreds of dollars range), but digital presence supports live show bookings and merchandise sales.
- Songwriter and record producer royalties: as a songwriter and listed record producer per his Wikipedia occupation fields, he likely receives ongoing mechanical and performance royalties from his catalog.
None of these income streams have publicly disclosed compensation figures. Touring fees for a guitarist at Schofield's level (internationally recognized in blues circuits, British Blues Award winner, with a dedicated following in Europe and the US) can range from a few thousand to tens of thousands of dollars per engagement depending on venue size and market. Over a career spanning more than two decades, that adds up, but exact figures are not in the public record.
Known assets and holdings

There are no publicly documented asset holdings for Matt Schofield the guitarist. No property registry records, investment disclosures, or business ownership filings have been verified to him in available public sources. It is worth noting that a "Schofield Properties LLC" exists as a family real estate business, but there is no evidence connecting it to the Manchester-born blues musician. Similarly, Schofield Consulting Limited in the UK is tied to a different Dr. Matt Schofield, not the guitarist. Treating either of those as relevant to his net worth would be a research error.
For a UK-based independent musician at his career stage, typical assets would plausibly include: a primary residence (value unknown), music equipment and intellectual property in his song catalog, potential equity in or a long-term relationship with Nugene Records, and savings or investments accumulated from two-plus decades of professional income. None of these can be confirmed or quantified from available public sources. The $12.9 million estimate implies a substantial asset base, but that claim cannot be traced to any specific asset or holding.
How his wealth likely built up over time
Even without hard financial data, the career timeline gives a reasonable framework for understanding when earnings likely accelerated.
- 2000–2007 (Early career): Career establishment phase, likely modest income. Building a reputation on the UK and European blues circuit, developing the trio format, and releasing early recordings. Income primarily from live gigs at smaller venues.
- 2008–2013 (Recognition phase): Growing international profile, including touring in the US and winning recognition from blues award bodies. More consistent festival bookings and larger venue fees. Early catalog building generating ongoing royalties.
- 2014 (Studio album 'Far As I Can See'): A notable release that represented a mature studio statement. A well-received album at this career stage typically expands touring opportunities and booking fees, and adds to the royalty-generating catalog.
- 2014–2019 (Peak touring years): Consistent international touring across the US and Europe at increasing fee levels. Production work for Ian Siegal and others added supplemental income streams beyond performing.
- 2020–2021 (COVID-19 impact): Live touring revenue dropped to near zero industry-wide. Any musician heavily reliant on live income would have seen a significant earnings dip during this period.
- 2022–2025 (Post-pandemic recovery and new releases): Return to touring, building back to prior fee levels or higher as demand recovered. New studio work culminating in 'Many Moons / Vol.1' in 2025 suggests continued active career investment.
- 2026 (Current): Active career with 25-plus years of catalog accumulating royalties, established international touring profile, and ongoing production activity.
How to verify this yourself and track updates
If you want to go further than the estimate on this page, here are the practical steps to check primary sources and spot unreliable claims.
- Check UK Companies House (find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk): search for 'Matt Schofield' or 'Matthew Schofield' as a person of significant control or director. Verify any result carefully against the musician's biographical details (born 1977, Manchester) before attributing it. As noted above, a different Dr. Matt Schofield appears in UK corporate records.
- Search the UK Land Registry (gov.uk/search-property-information-land-registry): property ownership records are publicly searchable in England and Wales for a small fee. This would confirm or deny real estate holdings under his name.
- Check music royalty organizations: PRS for Music (UK) does not publish individual royalty earnings, but confirming his registration as a songwriter and producer there confirms the royalty income stream is real.
- Review Discogs and streaming platforms: his catalog on Spotify, Apple Music, and Discogs gives a sense of release volume and catalog depth, which correlates with royalty income over time even if actual figures are not disclosed.
- Monitor his official website and Nugene Records: tour announcements and new releases are the clearest public signals of ongoing income activity. A major new album or extended tour cycle typically corresponds to a meaningful earnings period.
- Treat any net-worth site citing a single precise figure without primary source links skeptically: People AI, Celebrity Net Worth, and similar aggregators use model-based estimates. They are useful as rough indicators but should never be cited as confirmed figures. Their own disclaimers say as much.
- Set a Google Alert for 'Matt Schofield guitarist' to catch new press coverage, award announcements, or business news that could inform updated estimates.
For context within this site's coverage of Sch- surname wealth profiles, Matt Schofield sits in an interesting position: unlike some subjects in this space (where business ownership, corporate filings, or media-disclosed deals create a more verifiable data trail), his wealth profile is almost entirely built on private professional activity with no public financial disclosures. If you are comparing this with other similar celebrity profiles, check related breakdowns like scholes net worth to see how different methodologies can change the final number. If you are specifically looking for Matt Schlapp net worth figures, you may need separate sourcing because it is unrelated to the English blues guitarist’s numbers. That makes the estimation problem harder here than it would be for, say, a public company executive or a heavily covered media personality. The honest answer is that the $12. For additional context on how these kinds of figures are formed, see the breakdown of the mathew scholtz net worth-style estimation logic and common verification gaps. If you are comparing other influencer and musician wealth claims, you can also look up Dustin Schoenhofer net worth using the same source-checking approach described above. 9 million estimate is plausible given a long, successful independent music career, but it cannot be confirmed with the evidence currently available. For the latest figures and how they are derived, see the discussion of Matthew Schuler net worth estimates on this page.
FAQ
Why do different sites report wildly different net-worth numbers for Matt Schofield?
Most published figures rely on inference rather than audited records, and they weight inputs differently (touring assumptions, streaming estimates, social engagement scores, or “model” outputs). Even when the same headline number appears, the underlying assumptions and data freshness can change, so you should compare the reported methodology and update date, not just the dollar amount.
Does Matt Schofield’s UK location mean Companies House filings should exist for him?
Only in limited cases. Companies House typically reflects company directors or entities, not an individual’s personal net worth. If an artist operates through a separate company, a filing might exist, but the article explains there is no verified link to the musician, so unrelated Schofield entities should be treated as a common search-result mix-up.
How can I tell whether a “Matt Schofield” net-worth claim is accidentally about someone else?
Cross-check at least two identifiers besides the name, such as birth year (1977), birthplace (Manchester), band role (blues guitarist and singer), and label/credit context (for example, Nugene Records and the Matt Schofield Trio). If the claim does not match those specifics, treat it as a likely identity error.
What would a more credible evidence trail look like than a model score?
Look for primary indicators like documented publishing rights income, verified royalty statements, tax or court records that name the musician, property registrations tied to the correct person, or credible interviews quoting earnings tied to contracts. Short of that, anything that cannot be traced to identifiable assets or confirmed income is inherently speculative.
Could touring be the main driver behind a multi-million-dollar estimate?
It can be meaningful over a 20-plus-year career, but touring revenue is highly lumpy and venue-dependent. A good sanity check is to compare the number of tours and show frequency around album releases, then estimate gross versus take-home after agents, band costs, travel, taxes, and production expenses. Without those details, “multi-million” should be treated as an order-of-magnitude claim.
The article says YouTube revenue is tiny. How can that be if he has many views?
Views do not translate directly to earnings because monetization depends on ad rates, geography, viewer retention, ad inventory, and whether older videos are still monetized. The article’s point is that even reasonable YouTube ad ranges are small compared with the model’s multi-million total, meaning most of the estimate comes from social scoring rather than ad income.
If the estimate implies a large asset base, why can’t that be verified?
Because assets like a primary residence, savings, investments, or music-related ownership are generally private unless tied to public property records, company ownership with identifiable control, or court documentation. The article notes there are no verified public records that connect specific holdings to Matt Schofield the guitarist.
Is it safe to use the $12.9 million figure in comparisons or rankings?
Only as a rough, non-verifiable benchmark. For comparisons, you should normalize by methodology and uncertainty, or use a working range (like the article’s $5 million to $15 million) instead of a single-point number, since algorithmic estimates can over-smooth growth patterns.
What are common mistakes when estimating net worth for musicians with similar names?
Mixing the subject with another professional Matt or Matthew Schofield, assuming a real-estate or consulting business automatically belongs to the musician, or treating a generic “net worth” site output as if it reflects balance sheets. The article highlights both unrelated Companies House entities and other unrelated professionals showing up in search results.
What practical next steps can I take if I want a tighter range instead of a single number?
Start with career-based revenue mapping: identify album release years and corresponding touring bursts, estimate streaming catalog performance using public chart indicators, and account for production work as an additional income stream. Then bracket expenses and taxes using conservative assumptions, since take-home is usually far below gross revenue. This will still not produce audited net worth, but it will narrow the plausible band.
Citations
Wikipedia identifies Matt Schofield as an English blues guitarist and singer (born August 21, 1977; Manchester, England) and notes his band work as “the Matt Schofield Trio,” plus his role as a musician/songwriter/record producer.
Matt Schofield - Wikipedia - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matt_Schofield
People AI’s “Matt Schofield net worth” page explicitly disambiguates the subject as the English blues guitarist born 21 Aug 1977 in Manchester, England, and gives a single-point net worth figure for 2026 (“12.9 Million”).
Fame | Matt Schofield net worth and salary income estimation Apr, 2026 | People Ai - https://peopleai.com/fame/identities/matt-schofield
Wikipedia’s biography lists Matt Schofield’s occupation as musician/songwriter/record producer and shows his active years as 2000–present, which helps distinguish him from non-music Matt Schofields who appear in other search results (e.g., professionals with procurement/IT roles).
Matt Schofield - Wikipedia - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matt_Schofield
People AI claims “Matt Schofield Networth 2026 | 12.9 Million,” and also provides historical yearly points (2025: 11.6M; 2024: 10.3M; 2023: 9.03M; 2022: 7.74M). (No low/high range is shown—just a single figure per year.)
Fame | Matt Schofield net worth and salary income estimation Apr, 2026 | People Ai - https://peopleai.com/fame/identities/matt-schofield
People AI includes disclaimers stating these net-worth amounts are “calculated based on a combination social factors” and warns they are “just estimation” and “by no means accurate,” which is key for assessing reliability vs speculation.
Fame | Matt Schofield net worth and salary income estimation Apr, 2026 | People Ai - https://peopleai.com/fame/identities/matt-schofield
People AI also provides an additional “Youtube net worth” estimate methodology (based on YouTube views/subscribers) with a small numeric range in USD per their example (“$745.00~$1,490.00” from estimated ad/salary income), again presented as estimation with a disclaimer.
Fame | Matt Schofield net worth and salary income estimation Apr, 2026 | People Ai - https://peopleai.com/fame/identities/matt-schofield
People AI’s methodology signals (social-factor calculation + YouTube monetization/views-based income estimate) indicate a model-based inference rather than business/asset aggregation using primary financial records.
Fame | Matt Schofield net worth and salary income estimation Apr, 2026 | People Ai - https://peopleai.com/fame/identities/matt-schofield
A separate “Matthew Schofield” appears as a named professional in a forensic/consulting context (“Matthew Schofield | Senior Associate”)—an example of how search results can misattribute “Matt/Matthew Schofield” across unrelated people.
PERSONNEL QUALIFICATIONS | WJE (Schofield_Matthew.pdf) - https://www.wje.com/assets/pdfs/people/Schofield_Matthew.pdf
People AI’s net-worth page uses a single subject profile (the blues guitarist) rather than verifying identity with legal/business registration records, which increases uncertainty for net-worth claims even when the biography matches the musician.
Fame | Matt Schofield net worth and salary income estimation Apr, 2026 | People Ai - https://peopleai.com/fame/identities/matt-schofield
Wikipedia reports that Matt Schofield’s career includes multiple studio/live releases and production work (e.g., co-producing Ian Siegal’s “Meat & Potatoes” and producing Siegal-related releases such as “At The North Sea Jazz Festival”). These public creative credits are evidence of professional activity but not direct net-worth disclosure.
Matt Schofield - Wikipedia - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matt_Schofield
Wikipedia states Matt Schofield’s “Years active” are 2000–present, and lists discography items including studio albums such as “Far As I Can See” (2014) and “Many Moons / Vol.1” (2025). Such milestones can plausibly correlate with earnings over time, but they do not provide verifiable compensation figures.
Matt Schofield - Wikipedia - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matt_Schofield
Wikipedia’s “occupation” field is musician, songwriter, record producer—useful for matching the correct person when net-worth pages appear, but it does not establish salary, equity stake, or compensation contracts.
Matt Schofield - Wikipedia - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matt_Schofield
Wikipedia includes specific biographical metadata (born 21 August 1977; Manchester) that can be used to disambiguate against other Matt Schofields who show up in LinkedIn/company filings/obituaries with different birth years/locations and occupations.
Matt Schofield - Wikipedia - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matt_Schofield
People AI’s net-worth claim is not accompanied by primary evidence such as audited statements, SEC/Companies House filings, property registry records, or disclosed shareholdings; it is presented as “estimation” (social factors + monetization-view logic).
Fame | Matt Schofield net worth and salary income estimation Apr, 2026 | People Ai - https://peopleai.com/fame/identities/matt-schofield
People AI provides the “net worth score” percentage (e.g., 94% for 2026) despite being an estimated/composite metric rather than a court/registry-derived number—another sign the estimate is not sourced from verifiable asset records.
Fame | Matt Schofield net worth and salary income estimation Apr, 2026 | People Ai - https://peopleai.com/fame/identities/matt-schofield
Wikipedia references a label (“Nugene Records”) and provides external links (e.g., official website, Nugene Records, British Blues Awards). These help confirm identity and professional existence but do not directly provide equity ownership or detailed balance-sheet evidence.
Matt Schofield - Wikipedia - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matt_Schofield
A “Schofield Properties LLC” site exists for a different (unrelated by evidence in the provided sources) Schofield family business, illustrating that “Schofield” commonly appears in business contexts and increases risk of net-worth misattribution if identity is not carefully verified.
About Us (schofieldpropertiesllc.com) - https://schofieldpropertiesllc.com/about-us/
CompaniesInTheUK shows a UK company page for “SCHOFIELD CONSULTING LIMITED” and includes entries involving “Dr Matt Schofield” with a change of details/PSC information. This is an example of how corporate records can exist for a different Matt Schofield than the musician—but it was not linked (in the retrieved sources) to the musician net-worth claim.
SCHOFIELD CONSULTING LIMITED, WS1 2LT : Companies House Number 07789689 (companiesintheuk.co.uk) - https://www.companiesintheuk.co.uk/ltd/schofield-consulting
Binghamton University news identifies a “Matthew Schofield” (MPA ’11) as a senior director of procurement and analysis at Binghamton University’s Purchasing Office—demonstrating another distinct Matt/Matthew Schofield identity not related to the blues musician.
Behind the scenes, ahead of the curve - Binghamton University - https://www.binghamton.edu/news/story/5792/behind-the-scenes-ahead-of-the-curve/
Golf Digest reports on a “driving range manager, Matt Schofield” in New Zealand (2015 incident). This is yet another separate individual/identity example for why disambiguation matters for “Matt Schofield” net worth searches.
New Zealand driving range manager is NOT pleased after discovering thousands of golf balls stolen - https://www.golfdigest.com/story/new-zealand-driving-range-manager-is-not-pleased-after-discovering-thousands-of-golf-balls-stolen
Wikipedia states Matt Schofield performed as an organ trio configuration and discusses band member changes and tours (e.g., 2009 band name change, and 2010 replacement notes). This supports a career timeline of activity but still does not provide income/equity/asset data needed for a net-worth range based on primary evidence.
Matt Schofield - Wikipedia - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matt_Schofield
People AI presents a time-series of estimated net worth values by year (2022–2026), which can be used to plot a “wealth trajectory,” but the underlying model inputs are not tied to verifiable balance sheet or asset transactions in the page content.
Fame | Matt Schofield net worth and salary income estimation Apr, 2026 | People Ai - https://peopleai.com/fame/identities/matt-schofield
Wikipedia’s discography timeline includes studio album years (e.g., Far As I Can See released February 2014 per the article narrative) and later releases (e.g., 2025 “Many Moons / Vol.1”), which can plausibly align with the net-worth estimate increasing across People AI’s 2022–2026 values (7.74M → 12.9M). This alignment is plausible but not evidence-based causation.
Matt Schofield - Wikipedia - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matt_Schofield
People AI includes a YouTube monetization-based section referencing “latest Youtube stat on 2026-03-28” with view count and subscriber count. This suggests a methodology input date, but still represents an estimate rather than audited earnings.
Fame | Matt Schofield net worth and salary income estimation Apr, 2026 | People Ai - https://peopleai.com/fame/identities/matt-schofield
Mathew Scholtz Net Worth: Public Estimates and How to Verify
Verify Mathew Scholtz net worth with public records, source methods, evidence vs speculation, and an update checklist.


